McNab, F. and Ball, P. W. and Hoggard, M. J. and White, N. J. (2019) Reply to “Geochemical Characteristics of Anatolian Basalts: Comment on ‘Neogene Uplift and Magmatism of Anatolia: Insights from Drainage Analysis and Basaltic Geochemistry’ by McNab et al.”. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 20 (1). pp. 542-544. ISSN 15252027 DOI https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008034
![]() |
Text
McNab_et_al-2019-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf - Published Version Download (562kB) |
Abstract
Uslular and Gençalioğlu‐Kuşcu (2018) have written a lengthy, and highly critical, comment about McNab et al. (2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC007251) which states that our data compilation for Neogene (and Quaternary) volcanic rocks from Anatolia is selective, inconsistent, and not fit for purpose. We state for the record that our compilation is not based on analyses from the published GEOROC database. Uslular and Gençalioğlu‐Kuşcu (2018) also state that our subdivision of this database into three broad longitudinal categories is unrealistic since it does not consider the full range of different tectonic units. They conclude that our interpretation of the link between Neogene‐Quaternary volcanism and uplift of Anatolia is erroneous. We refute this rather strongly worded comment by carefully addressing the five substantive issues raised.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 2018AREP; IA74 |
Subjects: | 02 - Geodynamics, Geophysics and Tectonics |
Divisions: | 02 - Geodynamics, Geophysics and Tectonics 08 - Green Open Access 12 - PhD |
Journal or Publication Title: | Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems |
Volume: | 20 |
Page Range: | pp. 542-544 |
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GC008034 |
Depositing User: | Sarah Humbert |
Date Deposited: | 11 Apr 2019 11:22 |
Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2019 09:41 |
URI: | http://eprints.esc.cam.ac.uk/id/eprint/4462 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |